In the matter of Securitas Holdings, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2014-225 issued today by the the
U.S. Tax Court, the Court found that Securitas had established a bona fide captive insurance arrangement among its U.S. companies and was entitled to
interest expense and premium deductions. As with all true insurance companies (which most captive arrangements are if done for business purposes), the captive arrangement shifted risks, distributed
risks, and constituted "insurance" in order to make the premiums deductible.
Indeed, if a captive insurance company is applicable to your holding company structures, the tax and premium benefits may be substantial. This Office is happy to answer any questions that you may have concerning captive insurance arrangements.
The opinion of the Court can be found at this link:
http://ustaxcourt.gov/InOpTodays/SecuritasHoldings,Inc.Memo.Buch.TCM.WPD.pdf
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
A Step Forward for Captive Insurance - Securitas Holdings
Labels:
captive,
captive insurance,
insurance,
IRS,
Securitas
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
South Carolina Needs To Change Its Tax Climate - Tax Rankings Released
South Carolina is standing in the shadow of North Carolina (as well as the rest of the country) and needs to take the necessary steps to make the State more tax competitive to draw business as well as individuals. Currently South Carolina received the following rankings from the Tax Foundation's 2015 State Business Tax Climate Index. http://taxfoundation.org/sites/taxfoundation.org/files/docs/TaxFoundation_2015_SBTCI.pdf
South Carolina Overall Rank - 37th
Corporate Tax Rank - 13th
Individual Income Tax Rank - 41st
Sale Tax Rank - 18th
Unemployment Insurance Tax Rank - 40th
Property Tax Rank - 21st
From these rankings its clear there needs to be substantial changes to the individual income tax and unemployment insurance tax regimes in South Carolina. North Carolina made the single largest annual jump in the history of the rankings to No. 16 from No. 44 by lowering its corporate and individual income tax and its sales taxes. South Carolina should take the cue as there is no reason for us to be in the bottom percentile.
South Carolina Overall Rank - 37th
Corporate Tax Rank - 13th
Individual Income Tax Rank - 41st
Sale Tax Rank - 18th
Unemployment Insurance Tax Rank - 40th
Property Tax Rank - 21st
From these rankings its clear there needs to be substantial changes to the individual income tax and unemployment insurance tax regimes in South Carolina. North Carolina made the single largest annual jump in the history of the rankings to No. 16 from No. 44 by lowering its corporate and individual income tax and its sales taxes. South Carolina should take the cue as there is no reason for us to be in the bottom percentile.
Labels:
corporate tax,
individual tax,
rankings,
sales tax,
SCDOR,
south Carolina,
tax,
tax foundation,
tax rank
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Social Security Taxable Maximum Increased to $118,500
The maximum amount of earnings subject to Social Security tax will rise to $118,500 in 2015, from the current $117,000, the Social Security Administration announced today.
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
OVDP: Definition of Willful Left Broad
Jennifer Best of the
IRS stated that the IRS has deliberately refrained from offering a lot of examples about what
constitutes willful failure to disclose offshore assets. Taxpayers
are only allowed to use the Internal Revenue Service's streamlined offshore
voluntary disclosure program when they have failed to report foreign income or
foreign financial accounts or assets, if they can certify that their failure to
do so was non-willful. Every
taxpayer has a unique set of circumstances, therefore, definition of the term of "Willful" was intentionally left broad.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)