For a large company, tax rates and applicable credits can have a major impact on profitability. The expired research and development tax credit that Google lost shaved 2% off its profitability. For a company with billions in revenue and profits, 2% is not insubstantial. Proper tax planning and knowing your business's tax planning is a must.
wsjhttp://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304626304579509523971197320?KEYWORDS=google+taxes&mg=reno64-wsj
Monday, April 21, 2014
Expired Research & Development Tax Credit Clips Google's Profit
Labels:
google,
IRS,
profitability,
R&D,
research and development,
tax credit
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Funding ESOPs with S Corp Profits
Below is a link to an interest article from the WSJ that discusses a corporate structure to use S Corp profits to fund ESOPs. Obviously, the ESOP that wholly owns a profitable S Corp can provide a large funding opportunity for an owner's retirement. Planners need to watch the Austin v. Comm'r case development closely and pay attention Rev. Ruling 2004-4 to avoid potential challenges.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304419104579324851519855352?mg=reno64-wsj
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304419104579324851519855352?mg=reno64-wsj
Labels:
Austin v. Comm'r,
ESOP,
IRS,
retirement,
Rev Rul. 2004-4,
SCorp,
tax benefit
Sunday, April 13, 2014
Post and Courier Article on Cooper Client in Latham Case
Latham case co-defendant may get pre-trial diversion
- by natalie caula HAUFF
ncaula@postandcourier.com - Posted: March 28, 2014
Friday, April 11, 2014
Taxpayer Don't Forget to Report Foreign Financial Assets and Accounts:
With the tax return filing deadline fast approaching, taxpayers should not forget to report any foreign income or financial assets on their tax returns. Foreign dividends and interest must be disclosed on by checking the box on your Schedule B, and foreign income from trusts and gifts should be disclosed on the Form 3520. Even certain foreign assets totaling greater than $50,000.00 that are income producing or not must be disclosed on the Form 8938, Statement of Foreign Assets. Many tax return preparers in the past failed to ask clients if they had foreign income and assets, and such mistakes are less common with the prevalent media of the IRS's collection efforts against foreign assets. However, don't get unwittingly caught because the penalties for non-reporting are stiff.
Moreover, FBAR disclosures must be made this June 30th electronically to the U.S. Treasury through the following website: http://bsaefiling.fincen.treas.gov/main.html. It is not much comfort that the website is entitled, "Financial Crimes Enforcement Network."
If you have questions about foreign income or asset issues, feel free to contact us.
With the tax return filing deadline fast approaching, taxpayers should not forget to report any foreign income or financial assets on their tax returns. Foreign dividends and interest must be disclosed on by checking the box on your Schedule B, and foreign income from trusts and gifts should be disclosed on the Form 3520. Even certain foreign assets totaling greater than $50,000.00 that are income producing or not must be disclosed on the Form 8938, Statement of Foreign Assets. Many tax return preparers in the past failed to ask clients if they had foreign income and assets, and such mistakes are less common with the prevalent media of the IRS's collection efforts against foreign assets. However, don't get unwittingly caught because the penalties for non-reporting are stiff.
Moreover, FBAR disclosures must be made this June 30th electronically to the U.S. Treasury through the following website: http://bsaefiling.fincen.treas.gov/main.html. It is not much comfort that the website is entitled, "Financial Crimes Enforcement Network."
If you have questions about foreign income or asset issues, feel free to contact us.
Labels:
FBAR,
foreign assets,
foreign income,
Form 3520,
form 8938,
IRS,
tax returns
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
No Taxpayer Refunds: Supreme Court Rules that Severance Payments Are Subject to FICA
If you have followed this blog, we have been writing on the closely watched Quality Stores case involving the taxability of severance payments (United States v. Quality Stores Inc. (In re Quality Stores Inc.), 6th Cir., No. 10-1563, petition for rehearing filed 10/18/12). The Sixth Circuit held that payments a company made to employees as part of the company's severance program were not subject to tax under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) . This decision was appealed, and the Supreme Court decided to resolve the issue because of the Circuit split.
Unfortunately, on March 25, 2014, the Supreme Court ruled that severance payments (or SUB payments) were subject to FICA tax and withholding. Even the Supreme Court did not take pity on those who were, are or will be severed from their employment.
If you have followed this blog, we have been writing on the closely watched Quality Stores case involving the taxability of severance payments (United States v. Quality Stores Inc. (In re Quality Stores Inc.), 6th Cir., No. 10-1563, petition for rehearing filed 10/18/12). The Sixth Circuit held that payments a company made to employees as part of the company's severance program were not subject to tax under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) . This decision was appealed, and the Supreme Court decided to resolve the issue because of the Circuit split.
Unfortunately, on March 25, 2014, the Supreme Court ruled that severance payments (or SUB payments) were subject to FICA tax and withholding. Even the Supreme Court did not take pity on those who were, are or will be severed from their employment.
Labels:
FICA,
IRS,
Quality Stores,
SUB payments,
Supreme Court
Manufacturing Exception to Subpart F Income Is Extended to Products that Are Grown.
In Private Letter Ruling 201340010, the IRS extended the manufacturing exception for Subpart F income and applied the exception to products that are grown. The PLR specifically discusses the planted, harvesting and selling of corps by a controlled foreign corporations ("CFC"). Logical extensions of this ruling would be livestock or aqua-culture because the product is "grown."
If anyone ever wanted to own a vineyard in Argentina, this may be news you were waiting for.
Labels:
crops,
grown,
IRS,
manufacturing exception,
subpart F
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)